Source link : https://earth-news.info/general/column-is-whole-milk-better-than-low-fat-heres-what-the-science-says-the-washington-post/
As debates over nutrition continue to evolve, the choice between whole milk and low-fat milk remains a common point of confusion for consumers seeking the healthiest option. In this column, The Washington Post examines the latest scientific research to separate fact from fiction, exploring whether whole milk truly offers more benefits-or risks-compared to its low-fat counterpart. Here’s what the science says about milk fat, heart health, weight management, and overall wellness.
Health implications of whole milk versus low-fat options
Research comparing whole milk to low-fat options reveals a nuanced picture of their impact on health. While whole milk contains higher levels of saturated fat and calories, recent studies suggest that its consumption is not conclusively linked to increased cardiovascular risk as once thought. Some evidence even points to potential benefits, such as enhanced satiety and improved absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Conversely, low-fat milk reduces calorie intake and saturated fat but may be less satisfying, which could inadvertently lead to higher consumption of sugary snacks or beverages.
Key factors to consider include:
- Heart health: Both milk types show mixed results in relation to heart disease, with lifestyle factors playing a dominant role.
- Weight management: Whole milk’s fat content can promote fullness, potentially aiding in weight control, while low-fat alternatives offer fewer calories.
- Micronutrient absorption: Fat-soluble…
—-
Author : earthnews
Publish date : 2025-09-08 11:36:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.
—-
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8