Source link : https://bq3anews.com/seattle-attempted-to-ensure-upper-pay-for-supply-drivers-right-heres-why-it-didnt-paintings-as-supposed/
For those who’ve ever ordered meals via DoorDash, Uber Eats or Instacart, you’ll have discovered the one who delivers it isn’t a salaried worker. They’re gig staff – unbiased contractors who pick out up supply duties via an app, receives a commission in step with supply and haven’t any assured hours, advantages or minimal salary protections.
Policymakers in different towns have attempted to modify that.
Seattle is a great instance. In January 2024, the town carried out a legislation requiring supply apps to pay drivers a minimal charge for every assignment: a mix of per-minute and per-mile minimal reimbursement that set a flooring of US$5 in step with supply.
The function was once easy: be sure that the folks bringing you your lunch earn a good dwelling.
We’re exertions economists who’ve widely studied the emergence of the gig economic system and former coverage efforts designed to supply financial safety to staff in risky employment scenarios. We would have liked to know the way new gig economic system laws like the only in Seattle had been enjoying out in observe.
After we studied what came about to supply drivers’ profits after Seattle’s cost rule took impact, we discovered that regardless of base pay in step with supply kind of doubling, their overall per month profits slightly modified. That’s as a result of festival amongst drivers for supply duties intensified whilst consumers made fewer orders and tipped much less on every order within the…
—-
Author : bq3anews
Publish date : 2026-03-21 06:43:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.
—-
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8